Palestinian intellectuals and one state
Some Palestinian intellectuals understand a one state pursuit is not
feasible or advisable bc Israelis will never accept it and bc it
doesn’t even address the core Pal aspirations (ie refugee rights,
Palestinian national symbols/Statehood). Yet they nevertheless find it
useful to advocate it as a tactic to scare Israelis into moving
towards a two state solution.
But the danger with this tactic is twofold. First, Palestinian
citizens will be sold on this grand unachievable take-all vision,
feeding into absolutist impossibilites that people have been sold by
their pandering leadership (on both sides) for far too long. This is
precisely the opposite of what we need: to say to both sides what
needs to be said: peace will not come without necessary compromises.
Second, this plays straight into Israeli suspicions about Palestinian
intentions to reject Israel’s right to exist as the sole homeland of
the Jewish people.
Palestinians who still cling to this phased approach – and Israelis
who feel they can continue the occupation and ‘manage the conflict’ –
need to bear in mind the Gaza tragedy. So long as one side cannot live
with security and freedom, the other side will also face tragic
consequences.
Peace, security, freedom, respect and dignity CAN come to all, and
only to all, people in the region.
Sent from my iPhone – pardon typos
.
related posts
-
Bush’s Re-Commits To Two-State-Agreement Within 2008 in His State of the Union
"The time has come when a democratic Israel and a democratic Palestine live side by side in peace." – President George W. Bush in his State of the Union Address, where he received standing applause across both aisles for committing to achieve a two-stage agreement defining a Palestinian State before the end of 2008.
-
Bark vs. Bark: Unilateralism, One State Solution and Time
Palestinian negotiators invoke the fact that the window of opportunity for a two-state solution is closing and will soon be replaced by the call for a “One State Solution” in order to incite fear among Israelis and push them to the negotiating table. But this negative tactic is unwise, both because a “One State Solution” [...]
-
President Bush’s Statement on Israeli-Palestinian Peace Process
People should not allow their resentment against President Bush for other reasons to prevent their support of long overdue but positive and courageous steps towards ending the conflict. The statement below is evidence that we are on the right track. And it is no coincidence that much of the below, even if not detailed enough, [...]
-
Avraham Infeld Part III: Jewish Identity Is STRENGTHENED by a strong Palestinian Identity
A third particularly insightful and counterintuitive thought that Avraham shared: Arab Israelis increasingly see themselves as Palestinian citizens of Israel and that can be a very good thing for Jewish Israelis. It can help heal Israeli Jewish identity. But it needs a Palestinian culture that can flourish and not be feared, so that Palestinian citizens [...]
-
The One State Ultimatum
More and more mainstream Palestinians disenchanted with the continuing occupation are wondering if they should get behind the call for a "bi-national" "one state" approach. Most of them prefer a Palestinian State unencumbered by Israeli Jews, and would prefer a two-state solution. But they wonder if negotiations will ever really lead to this, and wonder [...]
post a new comment