Quote of the Week: on Politics
“…Republicans lead in the wrong direction and Democrats are unable to lead in any direction at all.”
- Lincoln Chafee, “Goodbye to All That,” NYTimes, February 20, 2010
Decoding food labels
It’s no surprise that some food labels are misleading or contain empty health claims. KIND recognizes all this fluff and our way to be transparent and fight the marketing gimmicks is by just truly using simple ingredients you can see and pronounce. A recent report examines food labeling and calls for changes in labeling policies, but with KIND, what you see is what you get.
FDA starting to hold big companies accountable
The FDA has issued a warning letter to food companies about the importance of accurate nutrition labeling and reprimanded their false or misleading claims.
Kids’ unhealthy snacking trends revealed
A recent study by the journal Health Affairs highlights the substantial increase in children’s snacking habits and analyzes the unhealthy snack foods that they tend to consume. That’s why the right kind of snacking – healthy snacking – is so important.
Hope for the center?
I’ve shared before how technology, media and politics can be (and often are) hijacked by the passionate extremes. In a recent article, Tyler Cowen argues that the “median voter theorem” posits that politicians can’t ultimately stray too far from the mainstream where citizens live.
Too Big to Lose
A lot has been written on the "Too Big to Fail" problem: the perception that some firms are so large that their failures would lead to systemic failure for the entire economy; the related conclusion that companies in that category should be bailed out to prevent a massive breakdown of the financial system; and the resulting moral hazard problem - that these big firms then can take all the risks in the world knowing there is no downside to them. A direct result of this problem has been that many Wall Street insiders profited at the expense of American taxpayers when they were bailed out by the US government.
But a no less serious problem is that some of these firms are "too big to lose." They wield so much influence over the economy that they can manipulate the outcome of their trades. It’s as if the President of the United States could short a particular market and then use his bully pulpit to scare the market to move in his direction.
A case in point is what Goldman did with mortgage securities. Gretchen Morgenson of the New York Times wrote an incisive article about the Goldman conflict with AIG. In it, she details how Goldman bet against the mortgage market by buying insurance from AIG on certain products that would pay if the underlying mortgage securities went south. There is nothing wrong with that - so far. For years, many (including me) also feared that a bubble had formed in real estate. Goldman’s Jonathan Egol and Ram Sundaram were smart and arguably even visionary to anticipate it and bet against mortgage securities. But the problem is what they did next. They proceeded to bully A.I.G., other business partners, and even the Federal Government, to pay them at valuations THEY arbitrarily set. The perception that Goldman bankers are the smartest bankers in the room helped them create the momentum that led to the devaluation from which they benefited.
Wall Street sharks will go where they smell the blood, and you cannot change that. It is a necessary feature of a market economy - which is the worst of all economic models, except for all other options, to paraphrase Winston Churchill.
But Paul Volcker’s call to structurally protect against these financial behemoths must be heeded. In this opinion piece he walks through some of the prescriptions that are necessary, including regulating which risks the different financial institutions can take, separating commercial banks from investment banks by reversing the recent decision to allow them to perform the same function and gamble with their account-holders’ savings, and limiting the leverage these firms can have.
Volcker’s Prescription
We’d do well to listen to former Fed Chairman Paul Volcker on the structural reforms the U.S. economy and financial sector need. I only hope politicians will rise above special interests and do what the nation needs to build a solid future.
First Lady To Fight Childhood Obesity Epidemic
Michelle Obama is poised to highlight the need for society to tackle and overcome the childhood obesity epidemic. Many forces are arrayed at her, including socio-cultural, as well as economic. She will need all the help she can get.
The following article lists a lot of ideas for how to fight childhood obesity. But one of the most effective ways is for responsible food companies to craft and market truly healthful products that taste good and are good for you, and that are attractive to kids. It is not easy. But it can be done.
Disingenuous Labeling
Manipulation of serving sizes is a serious problem. At the end of the day consumers need to use common sense and look for nutritionally rich foods and not hide in ‘100 calorie’ claims of products with empty calories - ie chips, soda, etc. But it would help society if reasonable standards were enforced so that unscrupulous food companies wouldn’t post silly claims about calorie count or sodium content in the front of the labels, that only a careful observer would realize assumes consumption of a fraction of the product.
This article describes the FDA’s efforts to zero in on the problem. But it doesn’t mention what most of the world - except the US - does. They require every product to list nutritional impact per 100 grams. I used to think that is confusing because you don’t necessarily consume 100 grams of that product. But it creates a benchmark that is easy to compare. And it doesn’t have to exclude an additional column for nutritional facts per portion.
Try KIND Bars @ Starbucks - for Free - This Friday
Samples of KIND Fruit & Nut and KIND Cranberry Almond bars will be provided at participating Starbucks stores nationwide on Friday, February 5th.
Offer applies to sample size products only. Limited time offer. While supplies last.
-
Progressive Business Ventures
-
Enterpreneurial Social Ventures
