Identity vs. Territorial Conflicts
Published under Gaza, Israel, Mideast Negotiations, Palestine Aug 29, 2011This recent article, by Daniel’s friend Gershon Baskin, adds valuable insight to the conversation about determining borders in the Mideast. Baskin explains that when creating borders, if a partition becomes undesirable, a territorial conflict becomes an identity-conflict, which is when there are two separate national or ethnic groups fighting to dominate the territory. The example that Baskin gives is as follows: When the former Yugoslavia was fragmented, various areas with obvious identities were able to become nation states; however, Bosnia and Herzegovina’s identities were muddled with various cultures and ethnicities, and a battle for control began. Baskin goes on to conclude that a one state solution for the Palestinian and Israeli conflict is not a solution at all. This option will only lead to a struggle over which identity will dominate that singular state, and for as long as Palestinians and Israelis are unwilling to compromise their identity, a two state solution is the only viable one.
Spotted by Daniel Lubetzky, by Adeena Schlussel