The Problem with Iran
What is the problem with the Iranian regime?
- Just this last week the Washington Post reported that yet again the Iranian government had sponsored a contest and released a book that caricatured the Holocaust. No matter what political position any person or country may hold, mocking a human tragedy and fomenting racism against any peoples betrays the sanctity of life and offends all of humanity.
- And at the very same time, this very Iranian regime continues to pursue efforts to develop nuclear bombs, according to Mohamed El Baradei, IAEA’s Director, as reported by Reuters.
Reuters
Iran on way to atomic bomb capability: ElBaradei
Fri Sep 26, 2008 11:07am EDT
MUNICH (Reuters) – Iran is on its way to mastering technology that would enable it to build atomic bombs, if it so chose, International Atomic Energy Agency director Mohamed ElBaradei said in remarks published on Friday.
Iran says its uranium-enrichment program is only for civilian purposes — electricity generation — but is under IAEA investigation and U.N. sanctions over past undeclared activity and failure to prove its intentions are wholly peaceful.
ElBaradei said having nuclear arms unfortunately still symbolized prestige and power, tempting nations with security worries to at least develop the potential for a bomb through the "dual use" enrichment process.
Beyond seven confirmed nuclear weapons powers, there is a wide range of countries with access to components — fissile material or the equipment to produce it — that could give them an atomic bomb "in a matter of months or a year," he said.
Asked by the Sueddeutsche Zeitung daily if Iran was also on its way to "virtual" nuclear-weapons power status, he said: "That is correct." But he added Tehran could not "break out" to a bomb as long IAEA monitors remained at its nuclear sites.
Iran has pledged to maintain regular IAEA inspections, but these are limited to a few declared facilities.
NUCLEAR "COOKBOOK"
"They have the cookbook … (But) right now they don’t yet have the ingredients — enough nuclear material to make a bomb overnight," ElBaradei said. He did not spell out how long Iran might need to reach that threshold, if indeed that was its goal. Some Western analysts say this could come within two years.
"The hope is that as long as (such countries) remain in the NPT (Non-Proliferation Treaty) with IAEA inspectors keeping watch, the likelihood is slim (they) would risk international isolation if they quit the treaty," ElBaradei said.
There has been talk in the United States and Israel, Iran’s arch-enemies, of last resort military action against Iranian nuclear sites although each remains formally committed to a diplomatic solution.
ElBaradei said the military option would be disastrous. The Iranian issue could not be resolved unless Washington dropped its refusal to negotiate with Tehran directly and without preconditions.
"The Iranian issue at its heart is really a question of security…The nuclear (part) is a symptom of an underlying sense of insecurity or a desire to be recognized as a major, regional power," ElBaradei told Sueddeutsche Zeitung.
"Europe is not really in the front seat (here). It is the U.S. who is in the front seat. The earlier that you have a direct negotiation between the U.S. and Iran, the earlier the prospect that we will have a solution," he said.
A settlement would have to address security issues across the region including the Israeli-Palestinian peace process and "the elephant in the room" — Israel’s undeclared nuclear arsenal, said ElBaradei.
"A military solution … will give (Iran’s) regime the full (domestic) support, the full justification to go for a crash course to develop nuclear weapons. The know-how is there, you cannot take it out of their minds.
"They will simply, in my view, go underground. The region is already in an unsustainable situation and adding an attack will simply create a ball of fire which will ricochet everywhere, in every part of the world," he said.
(Reporting by Mark Heinrich, Editing by Ralph Boulton)
————————–
Young Iranians Release Book Caricaturing The Holocaust
By Thomas Erdbrink
Washington Post Foreign Service
Sunday, September 28, 2008; A23
TEHRAN, Sept. 27 — Iranian students have released a book containing cartoons of the Holocaust, including some depicting hospitalized Jews on respiratory machines attached to canisters of Zyklon B, the gas used to exterminate Jews during World War II.
The students, members of a state militia, unveiled "Holocaust" in Tehran’s Palestine Square on Friday in the presence of Education Minister Ali Reza Ali-Ahmadi, during annual demonstrations calling for the retreat of "Zionists" from "occupied Palestine."
In a speech at the United Nations last week, Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad blamed "Zionists," rather than Jews, for the occupation of the Palestinian territories, a reference to the historical movement to reestablish a Jewish homeland. Iranian officials frequently draw that distinction, mindful of the approximately 25,000 Jews in Iran — more than in any country in the Middle East except Israel.
The book, however, talks explicitly of the history of the Jews "before, during and after the Holocaust." The cartoons show caricatured Jews with large, hooked noses trying to fabricate evidence for the Holocaust, while the text states that the Nazi massacre has been highly exaggerated, makes fun of testimonials from survivors and accuses present-day Jews of trying to make money from the Holocaust.
Ahmadinejad has publicly questioned whether 6 million Jews died during the Holocaust and in 2006 opened a conference in Tehran attended by Holocaust deniers. Former Ku Klux Klan leader David Duke was one of the speakers.
"We have seen many anti-Zionist stances but never anti-Semitic," said Siamak Mehre Sadegh, a Jewish member of the Iranian parliament who had not yet seen the book. "Anti-Semitism is not the official position of the country."
related posts
-
Reality Check on Iran
Can policy makers and strategists be really so naive? The Ahmedinejad regime has turned Iran’s right to nuclear development into a national mantra. Only its Islamic fundamentalism and its ideology of spreading their revolution stand above their nuclear ambition. And yet diplomats seem to think they can sway Iran into a set of incentives to [...]
-
Iran Can Only Be Stopped in Iran
With regards to the Hezbollah-Lebanon-Doha debacle, and the article by Barry Rubin that I blogged about here, I received some interesting comments from Ami Isseroff, who runs MideastWeb and who I consider one of the most thoughtful and thought-provoking analysts on the Middle East: There is no use comparing everything bad that happens to Munich. [...]
-
From Someone Who Survived the Iran Iraq War…
{I requested and got permission to share excerpts of this letter on my blog} Dear Daniel, It is my great pleasure to write to you and reach out to you on a cause that we both stand for and work for: Peace in the Middle East and in the World. A cause that is worthy [...]
-
Getting Leverage Over Iran
Thomas Friedman wrote an interesting article on the Cold War between the US and Iran. He writes: When you have leverage, talk. When you don’t have leverage, get some — by creating economic, diplomatic or military incentives and pressures that the other side finds too tempting or frightening to ignore. That is where the Bush [...]
-
Annapolis vis a vis Hamas and Iran
Hamas and Iran have vocally opposed Annapolis and deemed it a failure before it even started It is true that Hamas’s control of Gaza is a significant barrier to a two state solution A lot is at stake for Abbas; if no progress is made in Annapolis, he will be weakened; if no progress [...]
post a new comment