Dishonesty in a bottle
Although this product claims to be sugar free, it has corn syrup as its third ingredient, after water and palm oil (along with many other artificial sweeteners). Because of the way regulations are, the small amount of corn syrup contained in this product can legally be disregarded, making the product “sugar free.” Although this is technically legal, it is dishonest, unethical and and perversion of the law. To advertise this corn-based sweetener which adds sugar to drinks as “sugar free,” is silly.
related posts
-
Labelwatch.com
A new site just launched that analyzes food product labels for ingredients that may or may not be good for you. Too many items pose as "healthy" while containing ingredients like high fructose corn syrup which labelwatch exposes here as not healthful. The site is not perfect yet; it’s search engine is clunky; and it [...]
-
"The Center for Consumer Freedom"
With a name like that – The Center for Consumer Freedom – you can be sure this DC spin group has an industry-group agenda. The agenda in this case is to convince consumers that a product that does not exist in nature is the same as one that does – trying to say High Fructose [...]
-
Economics of Food Prices
Kelly Brownell in the Wall St Journal points out that today "healthy foods cost more and calorie-dense processed and fast foods cost less." This is partly because of subsidies to high fructose corn syrup and other sugar-laden and corn-derived industries. It is also because healthful foods without preservatives may not have as long shelf-lives as [...]
-
Report Shows that Healthy Businesses Excel
by Adeena Schlussel on behalf of Daniel Lubetzky In a recent article in Food Business News, Mintel International recently came out with a report titled “Attitudes Toward Sodium and High Fructose Corn Syrup Reduction,” which proves that companies working to develop products with reduced sodium and less amounts of high-fructose corn syrup are excelling. The [...]
-
All Natural?
Interesting court case about Snapple’s “all natural” claim – false labeling? 3rd Circuit Reinstates Consumer Fraud Class Action Against ‘All Natural’ Snapple Alison Frankel 08-14-2009 In a 30-page ruling on Wednesday, a three-judge panel of the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals revived a New Jersey statewide class action against Snapple (pdf), finding that federal [...]
comments
It’s not news that Americans eat more sugar than the should. I mean it’s not as if we’re not aware that we’re #1 in obstiey but infographics like this are less meaningful when you don’t look at our overall consumption of food. More disgusting is that the bottom 4/5ths of that dumpster is a sloshing mess of corn syrup. That dumpster of sugar would be parked behind an apartment tenement made of chicken pork and beef. I’d be much more interested in how many dumpsters we fill of ingredients that don’t occur in nature, red dye, preservatives, artificial flavoring, MSG, reconstituted food products.
post a new comment